Every URL mapped. Every redirect tested. Results benchmarked before and watched after.
Moving off WordPress without losing your rankings. Every URL mapped, every redirect tested, results benchmarked before and after. We know what breaks and we plan for it.
The fear that stalls every migration is the same one: will we lose our rankings? The honest answer is that plenty of teams do, because the agency treated it as a rebuild instead of a migration. We treat it as the high-stakes project it is. Every URL mapped. Every redirect tested. Metadata, schema, and internal links carried over. Rankings benchmarked before and watched after. You keep what you earned.
Most of our migrations start on a legacy CMS, and we built on WordPress for years before we moved to Webflow. We know where it breaks: custom post types that don't map cleanly, plugins doing three jobs at once, a REST API that's been locked down, media folders nobody organized, custom code in six places. We inventory all of it before anything moves.
Minor fluctuation for a few weeks is normal. Losing rankings is not, and it's avoidable.
Your site stays live until the new one is validated. We tell you the hours your people will spend and when. We give you a real timeline and cost before we start, and we recommend full rebuild or phased rollout after the audit, not before. Claude runs the repetitive parts, inventory, redirect maps, content transformation, QA comparison, so the timeline is shorter and the people on your project are doing judgment, not data entry.
Collections your team understands, components they can use, integrations that work, and training so the speed lasts. Webflow migration services that end at launch aren't finished. Ours end when your team is running the site.
Refresh or 1:1 rebuild, your call, recommended after the audit. Either way, on components your team can run after launch.
Rebuilt on Webflow with performance, accessibility, and the guardrails that let marketing ship without a developer.
Collections modeled from your content, not Webflow defaults. Posts, pages, custom post types, and media migrated and validated against the inventory. Scraped when the API is blocked.
Forms, CRM, automation, analytics, chat, and consent reconnected and tested before launch. Most plugins are replaced by native Webflow or one integration.
Handoff that sticks. Editor and CMS training on your site, documentation, and office hours after launch.
The protection method: full crawl and benchmark before, every URL mapped, redirects tested, crawl compared after, Search Console watched for weeks post-launch.
Will we lose our SEO rankings if we migrate to Webflow?
Not if the migration is run as a migration and not a redesign. We benchmark rankings and traffic before we start, map every URL, import and test every redirect, carry over metadata, schema, and internal links, and compare the crawl against the benchmark before launch. Then we watch Search Console and rankings after. Minor fluctuation for a few weeks is normal. Losing rankings is not, and it's avoidable.
What are the real benefits of migrating to Webflow, and is it worth the disruption?
Your team ships without a developer. Hosting, patching, plugin licenses, and security incidents stop being line items. Pages load faster, which shows up in rankings and conversions. And the site becomes something marketing can run instead of something IT maintains. Whether it's worth it depends on how much the old stack is costing you in developer hours and missed campaigns. We put that number in front of you before you decide.
How do we audit our current site before a Webflow migration?
Four inventories. A full crawl of every URL, including the ones nobody remembers. A content inventory: pages, posts, custom post types, media. A plugin and integration inventory, with what each one actually does. And an SEO benchmark: rankings, traffic, and Search Console, so there's a baseline to compare against. The audit is the first phase of our Webflow migration services, and it's what the timeline and cost are built on.
Full rebuild at once or phased rollout: which is smarter?
Depends on the site, and we won't recommend one until the audit is done. A full cutover is cleaner when the site is a few hundred pages and one team owns it. Phased makes sense when there are many business units, a large blog, or integrations that can't all move on the same day. Either way your current site stays live until the new one is validated.
What happens to our plugins and integrations?
Most plugins go away. Forms, SEO, caching, security, and backups are native to Webflow. What's left, CRM, marketing automation, analytics, chat, consent, gets reconnected as a direct integration and tested before launch. The plugin inventory in the audit tells us which is which, so nothing is discovered missing after cutover.
What about our blog with 2,000 posts, or custom post types?
That's the part we've done the most. Collections are modeled from your content, not Webflow defaults, so custom post types map to real structures instead of getting flattened. Posts, media, categories, authors, and metadata migrate by script and are validated against the inventory. When the REST API is locked down, we scrape. Claude does the transformation and the comparison, so 2,000 posts is a process, not a project.
How involved does our internal team need to be?
Less than you'd expect, and we tell you the hours up front. Your time goes to decisions: content review, design approval, sign-off on the redirect map and integrations. Inventory, redirect mapping, content transformation, and QA comparison are handled by us with Claude doing the heavy lifting. Your people spend their time on judgment, not data entry.
Do we need to freeze content during the migration?
Briefly, and only at the end. Your site stays live and your team keeps publishing through most of the project. We run a final delta migration before cutover to pick up anything that changed, then a short freeze, usually days, while the new site is validated and switched over. We schedule it around your campaign calendar.
Can we keep our current design?
Yes. A 1:1 rebuild keeps the design and moves the platform. Many teams take the chance to refresh, and some do both: rebuild 1:1 first so the SEO risk is isolated, then redesign on Webflow once the move is proven. We recommend after the audit, not before.
How long does a Webflow migration take, and what does it cost?
It depends on page count, CMS complexity, integrations, and how much of the design changes. What we promise is a real timeline and cost before work starts, not a range that doubles later. Tell us about the site and we'll give you a number to plan around.
How do we evaluate Webflow migration services that won't tank our SEO?
Ask for the method, in order. If they can't walk you through benchmark, URL map, redirect testing, metadata and schema carryover, crawl comparison, and post-launch monitoring, keep looking. Ask what happens to query strings and redirect chains. Ask who builds the redirect map and who tests it. Ask to see a before-and-after from a real migration. Webflow migration services are an SEO project first and a build project second.
Which platforms do you migrate from?
WordPress most often. We built on it for years before moving to Webflow, so we know where it breaks. Also Drupal, Sitecore, Adobe Experience Manager, HubSpot CMS, Squarespace, Wix, and custom-built sites. The platform changes the inventory, not the method.
What happens after launch?
We watch Search Console and rankings for weeks after cutover and fix anything that moves. Your team gets trained on your site, with documentation. Most teams keep us on for Ongoing WebOps so the site keeps improving instead of sitting there: a senior lead, a monthly plan, a weekly ship list.